A Better World" is the perfect title for this book
A Better World" is the perfect title for this book. That was the phrase used by members of the American Communist Party and their "fellow-travellers" in the 1930s and 1940s for slavishly following the party line laid down by Uncle Joe Stalin in the Soviet Union. You see, as O"Neill abundantly iluustrates, their mantra was "the end justifies the means. The new movie Trumbo shows the title character and his circle nobly and resourcefully trying to evade the big bad "Hollywood 10" investigators.
Start by marking A Better World: Stalinism and the American Intellectuals as Want to Read: Want to Read savin. ant to Read.
O'Neill, William L. Publication date. Intellectuals - United States - Attitudes, Progressivism (United States politics), Public opinion - United States, Radicals - United States - Attitudes, Soviet Union - Foreign public opinion, American, Soviet Union - Relations - United States, United States - Relations - Soviet Union. Books for People with Print Disabilities. Trent University Library Donation. Internet Archive Books.
Author: Oneill, William L; Format: Book; 447 . p. of plates : ill.
Oneill, William L. (1982). A better world : the great schism : Stalinism and the American intellectuals. New York : Simon and Schuster. Oneill, William L. A better world : the great schism : Stalinism and the American intellectuals, William L. O'Neill Simon and Schuster New York 1982. Australian/Harvard Citation. 1982, A better world : the great schism : Stalinism and the American intellectuals, William L. O'Neill Simon and Schuster New York.
O'Neill, a Rutgers U. historian and the biographer of Eastman, is certain . historian and the biographer of Eastman, is certain that truth is on the side of the anti-communists, whom he dubs the anti-Stalinists (as opposed to the fellow-travelers whom he calls progressives). In the latter instance, O'Neill rejects the view that anti-communism fed the climate that resulted in such involvements. Conferences and literary forums are dutifully recounted, and articles are copiously excerpted-but there is only History in Black-and-White: no complexity, no shadings, no insight.
William L. O'Neill's lively history of American women's struggle for equality is written with style and a keen sense for the . O'Neill treats seriously the ideas of the great feminist leaders and their organizations
William L. O'Neill's lively history of American women's struggle for equality is written with style and a keen sense for the variety of possible interpretations of 150 years of the feminist movement, from its earliest stirring in the 1830's to the latest developments in the 1980s. O'Neill treats seriously the ideas of the great feminist leaders and their organizations. His was the first book to deal directly with the failure of feminism as a social force in American society; to tie together the scattered people and events in the history of American women; and to examine seriously feminist experience in the twentieth century.
By William L. O'Neill.
A Better World: The Great Schism-Stalinism and the American Intellectuals. A Better World: The Great Schism-Stalinism and the American Intellectuals. By William L. This outspoken and often polemical history recaptures the violent arguments among American intellectuals, mostly New York writers, in the 1940s and 1950s over the nature of Stalin's Russia. O'Neill extolls the anti-Stalinists and excoriates those who failed to denounce the Soviet Union.
A Better World : Stalinism and the American Intellectuals.
William Lawrence O'Neill, American History educator. National Endowment Humanities fellow, 1979-1980. A Better World-The Great Schism: Stalinism and the American Intellectuals (Touchstone Books (Paperback)). Member American History Association. 92675/?tag prabook0b-20. The Last Romantic: A Life of Max Eastman.
After graduating from the University of Michigan, he received a doctorate in history at the University of California, Berkeley. He taught at the universities of Pittsburgh, Colorado, and Wisconsin. He wrote several books including The Last Romantic: A Life of Max Eastman, Coming Apart: An Informal History of America in the 1960's, A Better World: The Great Schism: Stalinism and the American Intellectuals, American High: The Years of Confidence 1945-1960, and A Democracy at War: America's Fight at Home and Abroad in World War II.
This book chronicles the struggle among non-Communist leftists and liberals over American relations with the Soviet Union from 1939 through the 1950s. Few now care as passionately and as violently as people did then about Soviet-American relations. It was a time when friends became enemies, and others forged strange alliances, all in the name of commitments that today seem remote. A Better World evokes those times and their choices, and explains why these long-ago battles still arouse such deep feelings today—and should.
Americans who were pro-Soviet without being members of the Communist party—“progressives” as they called themselves—had a large emotional investment in the Soviet Union. From 1935 to 1939 literally millions joined the “Popular Front” of pro-Soviet organizations. O’Neill takes us through the shock of the Stalin-Hitler pact of 1939, through the revival of the Popular Front spurred by government and business support after Russia entered the war against Hitler. He traces the isolation of the anti-Stalinists, the rise and fall of Henry Wallace, and the eclipse of progressivism. And he explores the shifting allegiances of intellectuals as they struggled, often with each other, to influence the course of public debate, with long-lasting consequences for American intellect, culture, and morals.
As O’Neill observes in his introduction, “More than any of my other books A Better World inspired correspondents to send me probing or reflective letters.” It was this response, along with the extraordinary critical debate spurred by initial publication of this volume, that makes the book’s continuing importance clear. The dream of achieving a better world through radical violence never dies, and the willingness of apologists to cling to utopian visions persists. As long as it does, the lessons of this book need to be available to us.