The United States currently imposes a commercial, economic, and financial embargo against Cuba. The United States first imposed an embargo on the sale of arms to Cuba on March 14, 1958, during the Fulgencio Batista regime

The United States currently imposes a commercial, economic, and financial embargo against Cuba. The United States first imposed an embargo on the sale of arms to Cuba on March 14, 1958, during the Fulgencio Batista regime. Again on October 19, 1960 (almost two years after the Cuban Revolution had led to the deposition of the Batista regime) the . placed an embargo on exports to Cuba except for food and medicine after Cuba nationalized American-owned Cuban oil refineries without compensation

The Trump administration tightened a Cuban embargo on March 4. (Yamil .

The Trump administration tightened a Cuban embargo on March 4. (Yamil Lage/AFP/Getty Images). Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement that the administration was lifting a prohibition against such suits, as long as they were filed against one of about 200 companies and businesses in which the Cuban security services have a financial interest. wrote on Twitter early Monday in anticipation of the announcement.

Neither ticket was oriented toward lifting, or easing, the embargo

Before 1959, the United States was the island nation's largest trading partner. embargo policy itself has remained relatively stable since its origins during the heart of the Cold War, the dynamics that produce and govern that policy have changed dramatically. Neither ticket was oriented toward lifting, or easing, the embargo. In Florida, Gore probably hoped that with the help of Joe Lieberman, a long time hardline supporter of the embargo, he might offset the Bush family’s statewide connections to Cuban Americans.

Cuba–United States relations are bilateral relations between the Republic of Cuba and the United States of America

Cuba–United States relations are bilateral relations between the Republic of Cuba and the United States of America. Cuba and the United States restored diplomatic relations on 20 July 2015, relations which had been severed in 1961 during the Cold War. . diplomatic representation in Cuba is handled by the United States Embassy in Havana, and there is a similar Cuban Embassy in Washington, .

President Reagan plans to tighten the United States economic embargo of Cuba . The embargo is already comprehensive

President Reagan plans to tighten the United States economic embargo of Cuba that was first imposed in the early 1960's, Administration officials said today. On the efforts to tighten the embargo, a State Department official said: ''We have been looking at improved enforcement of the policy of embargo in light of the fact that there are some holes, some chinks, and also to demonstrate that suspension of an existing agreement, and unreasonable attitudes with respect to restoring that agreement, do exact a price. The embargo is already comprehensive

The embargo was tightened in October 1992 . Since the Administration lifted the embargo on Vietnam many people are asking: Why not Cuba?

The embargo was tightened in October 1992, with the passing of the 'Cuba Democracy Act'. The law is intended to isolate the Castro regime and includes sanctions on third nations and foreign affiliates of US companies doing business with Cuba. Further restrictions were imposed this August. The United States hoped for greater polarization between government and the population but this could result in a violent social conflict. In this sense, the 'Cuba Democracy Act' is no longer a viable option for pursuing democracy and democratic change in Cuba. Since the Administration lifted the embargo on Vietnam many people are asking: Why not Cuba?

The United States Government has defended its trade embargo against Cuba, rejecting . The president believes that the trade embargo is a vital part of American foreign policy and human rights policy toward Cuba," Mr Fleischer said.

The United States Government has defended its trade embargo against Cuba, rejecting calls from former President Jimmy Carter for the ban to be lifted. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said trade with Cuba would only serve to "prop up a repressive regime" and would not benefit the people of the island. He said some things that Cuban people have not heard before about their rights, about their freedom in Cuba, and that's helpful and positive. Trade with Cuba does not benefit the people of Cuba.

Diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba broke off in 1961, with tensions increasing after Cuba signed . The embargo's crippling effects on the Cuban economy prompted Raul Castro to beef up efforts to end the embargo once he took the helm in 2008

Diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba broke off in 1961, with tensions increasing after Cuba signed a trade agreement with the Soviet Union. The embargo's crippling effects on the Cuban economy prompted Raul Castro to beef up efforts to end the embargo once he took the helm in 2008. While Cuba was sustained by a serious trading relationship with the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War, the Cuban economy took a hard hit with the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991.

In 2015 US President Barack Obama made a step toward the improvement . The conditions for lifting the embargo include "the return to a democratic path, elections and respect for human rights," Arcos noted.

In 2015 US President Barack Obama made a step toward the improvement of US-Cuban relations. After six months of negotiations, the two nations resumed diplomatic relations; on July 20, 2015 the US reopened its embassy in Havana. It is also true that Cuba still remain. bitter enemy of the United States in every possible scenario in the world," he claimed. According to Arcos, the crux of the matter is that Cuba continues to have "a significant influence on left-wing" forces in Latin America despite the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Policy toward Cuba is one example. Within the United States, disputes over . policy toward Fidel Castro’s government have become more broadly divisive because former anti-Castro colleagues are now at odds with one another

Policy toward Cuba is one example. policy toward Fidel Castro’s government have become more broadly divisive because former anti-Castro colleagues are now at odds with one another. Increasingly, longtime American critics of Castro and his actions are concluding that, in the post–Cold War era, the United States needs a new policy toward the island