Read by Julian Perry Robinson. See a Problem? We’d love your help.
Read by Julian Perry Robinson.
By (author) Julian Perry Robinson.
Julian P. Perry Robinson . The 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibits chemical warfare (CW) but not possession of CW weapons. For a more extended discussion of some of the points raised, see: J. P. Perry Robinson, Verifying a ban on chemical-warfare weapons, Faraday Discussion Paper no. 12, London: The Council for Arms Control, July 1988.
Читать онлайн - Harris Robert. A Higher form of Killing Электронная библиотека e-libra. ru Читать онлайн A Higher form of Killing. Robert Harris and Jeremy Paxman A HIGHER FORM OF KILLING The Secret History of Gas and Germ Warfare In no future war will the military be able to ignore poison gas. It is a higher form of killing. Professor Fritz Haber, winner of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, inventor of chemical warfare, 1923.
The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) is an arms control treaty that outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons and their precursors. The full name of the treaty is the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction and it is administered by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), an intergovernmental organization based in The Hague, The Netherlands.
Banning Chemical Weapons : The Scientific Background by Hugh D. . Crone. The aim of this volume is to provide technical information to people interested in the broader aspects of disarmament, by showing how it must be used in negotiations to achieve a worldwide and enforceable ban on chemical weapons. Chemical and biological warfare-threat of the future by Evelyn Le Ch‹ene.
Spiers’s book traces the origins of chemical and biological warfare from their ancient beginnings to the first major use of.
Spiers’s book traces the origins of chemical and biological warfare from their ancient beginnings to the first major use of gas in 1915 in World War I, to more recent uses and suspicions of use. (Arms Control). The use of chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq War, followed by the Rabta controversy in Libya and the threat of chemical and biological attack during the Gulf War, dramatised the consequences of the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons.
Verifying a Trojan horse: a zone (Manfred Hamm) SIPRI Chemical & Biological Warfare Studies is a series of studies intended primarily for specialists in the field of CBW arms control an.
Verifying a Trojan horse: a zone (Manfred Hamm). Creating a zone free of chemical weapons: an essential step towards arms limitation and disarmament (Ralf Stöhr). Ralf Trapp is a chemist by training. SIPRI Chemical & Biological Warfare Studies is a series of studies intended primarily for specialists in the field of CBW arms control and for people engaged in other areas of international relations or security affairs whose work could benefit from a deeper understanding of particular CBW matters.
Chemicals companies around the world are preparing for the consequences of a ban on chemical weapons, signed by 130 nations in Paris last week
Chemicals companies around the world are preparing for the consequences of a ban on chemical weapons, signed by 130 nations in Paris last week. International inspection teams will visit some plants, and companies will have to keep detailed records of what they did with chemicals that can be used as ingredients in weapons. Last week’s signing ceremony ended 20 years of diplomatic manoeuvring, but for the chemicals industry it only sets the stage for more important negotiations.
Concluding that biological weapons served no substantial military purpose for the US and that their proliferation would . Meselson and his colleagues have undertaken three on-site investigations with implications for chemical and biological weapons arms control.
Concluding that biological weapons served no substantial military purpose for the US and that their proliferation would pose a serious threat and that, in years ahead, the exploitation of advanced biology for hostile purposes would be inimical to society generally, he worked to persuade members of the Executive Branch, the Congress and the public that the US had no need for such weapons.